The eclipse came and went last week. I drove north, to Vermont, to be in the path of totality—a technical phrase (and location) that quickly caught on with the public and the press. It was the original title of my debut novel about the 1878 total solar eclipse. But my editor thought it was too obscure and technical a title for the reading public, so I changed it.
Before the April 8 eclipse, I re-read the part of my novel about the main character’s description of the 1878 eclipse he witnessed. While I didn’t have his clear sky view on the open prairie east of Denver, I did witness a few of the same things, including, the sudden chill, the sharpened shadows, the increase in blueish light, the sudden darkness, and the corona.
Every total solar eclipse never lasts as long as we want it to last. That was certainly the case on April 8. I was frantically busy watching, talking, trying to take photographs, and worrying that I might miss some important part of it.
As Professor Maria Mitchell says in my novel, “We all observed the same eclipse, but all of us may have taken note of different sights and colors. In the end, an eclipse is an individual experience. Depending on where you are, the quality of your eyes, the clarity of the sky in your location. All affect what you observe. This is why we make notes and compare observations among different individuals in different locations. Only then are we able to piece together all of the many—and fleeting—characteristics of the eclipse and so come to truly know it and appreciate its majesty.”
Indeed.